Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributorLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSes_CL
dc.contributor.authorChinchon, Eduardo [Chile. Universidad Mayor]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Danny [Chile. Universidad Mayor]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorStehberg, Jimmy [Chile. Universidad Andrés Bello]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Felipe [Chile. Universidad Andrés Bello]es_CL
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T13:04:16Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T13:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2012es_CL
dc.identifier.citationTapia, P., Chinchón, E., Morales, D., Stehberg, J., & Simon, F. (2012). Effectiveness of short-term 6-hour high-volume hemofiltration during refractory severe septic shock. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 72(5), 1228-1238.es_CL
dc.identifier.issnISSN 2163-0755es_CL
dc.identifier.issnESSN 2163-0763es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Abstract/2012/05000/Effectiveness_of_short_term_6_hour_high_volume.14.aspxes_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318248bc6ces_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/2674
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The effectiveness of a single 6-hour session of high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) was evaluated in terms of decreased norepinephrine (NE) requirements, progressive refractory hypotension and hypoperfusion by the fourth hour, and observed versus expected hospital mortality in patients with refractory severe septic shock. METHODS: A prospective cohort study conducted at the intensive care unit with 31 patients suffering from severe septic shock (NE dose >= 0.3 mu g(.)kg(-1.)min(-1) to maintain mean arterial pressure 70-80 mm Hg and lactic acidosis) and refractory to treatments recommended by Surviving Sepsis Campaign, 2008. All patients were subjected to a single short-term 6-hour HVHF with a goal-directed protocol. Changes in NE dose, hemodynamic, metabolic, and respiratory parameters were measured at the onset (t(0)), 4 (t(4)) and 6 hours (t(6)) during HVHF. Patients were considered responders if by t4 of HVHF, they showed a decrease in NE dose >= 50%, maintaining mean arterial pressure 80 mm Hg to 70 mm Hg. RESULTS: Twenty-five of the 31 patients responded to HVHF treatment (responders), whereas 6 did not (nonresponders). In the responders group, a decrease in NE dose was observed by t4 (1.3 +/- 0.5 mu gkg(-1.)min(-1)). This beneficial effect was maintained by t6 of treatment. Hemodynamic, metabolic, and respiratory parameters and other organic function indicators were also significantly improved by t4 and maintained by t6. Hospital mortality (45.16%) was significantly lower than that predicted by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (>90%): 83% for nonresponders versus 36% for responders. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a single session of short-term 6-hour HVHF in patients with refractory severe septic shock reduces NE dose requirements and improves organic function already by the fourth hour of treatment.es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipEste trabajo no contó con financiamiento.es_CL
dc.format.extentARTÍCULO ORIGINALes_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherCIENCIASes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chilees_CL
dc.subjectCIENCIAS DE LA SALUDes_CL
dc.titleEffectiveness of short-term 6-hour high-volume hemofiltration during refractory severe septic shockes_CL
dc.typeArtículo o Paperes_CL
umayor.indizadorCOTes_CL
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoLicencia color: AMARILLO (Puede archivar el pre-print (ie la versión previa a la revisión por pares))--Pre-print del autor: el autor puede archivar la versión pre-print (ie la versión previa a la revisión por pares) Post-print del autor: el autor puede archivar la versión post-print (ie la versión final posterior a la revisión por pares) siempre que se cumplan las restricciones: 12 meses de embargo Versión de editor/PDF: cross el autor no puede archivar la versión del editor/PDF. Condiciones generales: Algunas revistas tienen políticas independientes, consultar directamente con cada revista, El pre-print debe retirarse al ser aceptado para su publicación, Post-print may be deposited in personal website or institutional repository, La versión de editor/PDF no puede utilizarse, Debe incluirse declaración de que no se trata de la versión publicada, La fuente publicada debe reconocerse con la cita completa, La declaración establecida debe acompañar el depósito, Debe ir enlazado a la versión de editor, NIH authors will have their accepted manuscripts transmitted to PubMed Central on their behalf after a 12 months embargo (see policy for details), Wellcome Trust and HHMI authors will have their accepted manuscripts transmitted to PubMed Central on their behalf after a 6 months embargo (see policy for details), RCUK authors articles will be released as Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives after 6 months// Disponible en: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2163-0755/es/es_CL
umayor.indexadoWOSes_CL
umayor.indexadoSCOPUSes_CL
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/TA.0b013e318248bc6ces_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q2es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)sin informaciónes_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace