Effects of pregrazing herbage mass in late spring on enteric methane emissions, dry matter intake, and milk production of dairy cows

Abstract

Few studies have examined the effects of fresh forage quality on enteric methane (CH4) emissions of dairy cows under grazing conditions. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of 2 contrasting forage qualities induced by different pregrazing herbage masses in late spring on enteric CH4 emissions and milk production of grazing dairy cows. The experiment was conducted as a crossover design with 24 lactating Holstein Friesian dairy cows randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments in 2 experimental periods. Each period had a duration of 3 wk (2 wk for diet adaptation and 1 wk for measurements), and the interval between them was 2 wk. Treatments consisted of 2 target pregrazing herbage masses [2,200 and 5,000 kg of dry matter (DM)/ha above 3 cm], generated by different regrowth periods, corresponding to low (LHM) and high (HHM) herbage mass treatments, respectively. Daily herbage allowance (Lolium perenne) for both treatments was 20 kg of DM per cow measured above 3 cm. Enteric CH4 emissions were individually determined during the last week of each period using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Daily herbage intakes by individual cows during the CH4 measurement weeks were estimated using the n-alkanes technique. During the CH4 measurement weeks, milk yield and body mass were determined twice daily, whereas milk composition was determined once in the week. The LHM pasture had a higher crude protein concentration, lower neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber concentrations, and higher in vitro digestibility, with a lower proportion of ryegrass pseudostems, than the HHM pasture. Cows offered the LHM pasture had greater herbage (+13%) and total DM (+12%) intakes, increased milk (+13%) and energy-corrected milk (+11%) yields, and tendencies toward higher milk protein (+ 4.5%) and higher milk urea nitrogen (+ 15%) concentrations than their counterparts offered the HHM pasture. No differences were found between treatments in total daily CH4 production. However, the LHM treatment reduced enteric CH4 emissions per unit of milk yield (-11%) and enteric CH4 energy as a percentage of ingested gross energy (-9%) and tended to reduce CH4 per unit of dry matter intake (-8.2%) and energy-corrected milk yield (-10%) compared with the HHM treatment. The results from this study suggest that a grazing management that favors better quality pasture, as was the case of the LHM pasture in late spring compared with the HHM pasture, increases milk production of grazing dairy cows and reduces enteric CH4 emissions per unit of milk produced, constituting a viable CH4 mitigation strategy.

Few studies have examined the effects of fresh forage quality on enteric methane (CH4) emissions of dairy cows under grazing conditions. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of 2 contrasting forage qualities induced by different pregrazing herbage masses in late spring on enteric CH4 emissions and milk production of grazing dairy cows. The experiment was conducted as a crossover design with 24 lactating Holstein Friesian dairy cows randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments in 2 experimental periods. Each period had a duration of 3 wk (2 wk for diet adaptation and 1 wk for measurements), and the interval between them was 2 wk. Treatments consisted of 2 target pregrazing herbage masses [2,200 and 5,000 kg of dry matter (DM)/ha above 3 cm], generated by different regrowth periods, corresponding to low (LHM) and high (HHM) herbage mass treatments, respectively. Daily herbage allowance (Lolium perenne) for both treatments was 20 kg of DM per cow measured above 3 cm. Enteric CH4 emissions were individually determined during the last week of each period using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Daily herbage intakes by individual cows during the CH4 measurement weeks were estimated using the n-alkanes technique. During the CH4 measurement weeks, milk yield and body mass were determined twice daily, whereas milk composition was determined once in the week. The LHM pasture had a higher crude protein concentration, lower neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber concentrations, and higher in vitro digestibility, with a lower proportion of ryegrass pseudostems, than the HHM pasture. Cows offered the LHM pasture had greater herbage (+13%) and total DM (+12%) intakes, increased milk (+13%) and energy-corrected milk (+11%) yields, and tendencies toward higher milk protein (+ 4.5%) and higher milk urea nitrogen (+ 15%) concentrations than their counterparts offered the HHM pasture. No differences were found between treatments in total daily CH4 production. However, the LHM treatment reduced enteric CH4 emissions per unit of milk yield (-11%) and enteric CH4 energy as a percentage of ingested gross energy (-9%) and tended to reduce CH4 per unit of dry matter intake (-8.2%) and energy-corrected milk yield (-10%) compared with the HHM treatment. The results from this study suggest that a grazing management that favors better quality pasture, as was the case of the LHM pasture in late spring compared with the HHM pasture, increases milk production of grazing dairy cows and reduces enteric CH4 emissions per unit of milk produced, constituting a viable CH4 mitigation strategy.