Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributor.authorSalinas, Vicente [Univ Mayor, Fac Estudios Interdisciplinarios, Nucleo Matemat Fis & Estadist, Manuel Montt 318, Providencia 7500628, Chile]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, Carolinaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorFeliu, Danieles_CL
dc.contributor.authorAguilar, Claudioes_CL
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza-González, Rodrigoes_CL
dc.contributor.authorLund, Fernandoes_CL
dc.contributor.authorMújica, Nicoláses_CL
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-08T14:11:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-13T18:12:41Z
dc.date.available2020-04-08T14:11:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-13T18:12:41Z
dc.date.issued2018es_CL
dc.identifier.citationEspinoza, C., Feliú, D., Aguilar, C., Espinoza-González, R., Lund, F., Salinas, V., & Mujica, N. (2018). Linear versus nonlinear acoustic probing of plasticity in metals: A quantitative assessment. Materials, 11(11), 2217.es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/6164
dc.description.abstractThe relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. The RUS results are compared with Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (NRUS) as well as Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) measurements. NRUS has a higher sensitivity by a factor of two to six and SHG by 14-62%. The latter technique is, however, faster and simpler. As a main result, we obtain a quantitative relation between the changes in the nonlinear parameters and the dislocation density variations, which in a first approximation is a linear relation between these differences. We also present a simple theoretical expression that explains the better sensitivity to dislocation content of the nonlinear parameters with respect to the linear ones. X-Ray diffraction measurements, although intrusive and less accurate, support the acoustics results.es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipFondecytComision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)CONICYT FONDECYT [1160823, 3160164]; FONDEQUIP [EQM 140095]es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by Fondecyt Grant 1160823, Fondecyt Postdoctoral Grant 3160164 and FONDEQUIP EQM 140095.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherMDPIes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceMaterials, NOV 2018. 11(11)
dc.subjectMaterials Science, Multidisciplinaryes_CL
dc.titleLinear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessmentes_CL
dc.typeArtículoes_CL
umayor.facultadCIENCIASes_CL
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoDOAJ Gold, Green Publishedes_CL
umayor.indexadoWOS:000451755500152es_CL
umayor.indexadoPMID: 30413073es_CL
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.3390/ma11112217es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q2es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)SCIMAGO/ INDICE H:es_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace