Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Benjamín [Univ Mayor, Dept Oral Pathol, Santiago, Chile]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorFarina, Rodrigoes_CL
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Andreaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorToledo, Ximenaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Rodrigoes_CL
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Hernanes_CL
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T15:37:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T15:37:55Z
dc.date.issued2019es_CL
dc.identifier.citationFariña, R., González, A., Toledo, X., Villanueva, R., Martínez, B., & Pérez, H. (2019). Relationship Between Nostril, Nasal Valve and Minimal Cross-Sectional Area in Functional Upper Airway. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(7), 2202-2206.es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005791es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/6566
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To propose a three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of upper airway (UA) related to its functionality, defining normal reference values in healthy individuals and the relationship between nostril, nasal valve, and minimal cross-sectional area (MCS) in functional upper airway. Materials and Methods: The UAs of 20 Class I patients were analyzed with CBCT using Nemoceph 3D-OS and HOROS software, determining linear distances, volumes and cross-sectional areas, including MCS. Results: MCS was mostly located in the middle-upper oropharynx and high hypopharynx. MCS showed moderate correlation with the area of both nares (BNA) (r = 0.60, P = 0.004) and high correlation with the area of both internal nasal valves (BNV) (r = 0.66, P = 0.0016). BNA and BNV showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.445, P = 0.049). A total upper airway (TUA) and functional upper airway (FUA) volumes were established. TUA and FUA showed the strongest statistical correlation (r = 0.82, P = 0.00). A paired samples t test compared the measurement as absolute values of MCS with BNA (t = 0.781, P = 0.44), with BNV (t = -0.12, P = 0.90); and BNA with BNV (t = -0.76, P = 0.45), showed no significant differences. Conclusions: A functional cephalometric analysis of the UA with stable parameters in cervical spine and normal reference values has been proposed. BNA and BNV could be used as reference to establish the MCS compatible with respiratory health.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceJ. Craniofac. Surg., OCT, 2019. 30(7): p. 2202-2206
dc.subjectSurgeryes_CL
dc.titleRelationship Between Nostril, Nasal Valve and Minimal Cross-Sectional Area in Functional Upper Airwayes_CL
dc.typeArtículoes_CL
umayor.facultadCIENCIAS
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoRoMEO yellow journal (Puede archivar el pre-print (ie la versión previa a la revisión por pares). Disponible en: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.phpes_CL
umayor.indexadoWOS:000500374200114es_CL
umayor.indexadoPMID: 31403514es_CL
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005791es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q4es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)SCIMAGO/ INDICE H: 66 Hes_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace