Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributor.authorZapata, Beatriz [Univ Mayor, Fac Ciencias, Escuela Biotecnol]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorRiveros F, JoséLuises_CL
dc.contributor.authorCorrea, Lina Mariaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorGoddard, Petees_CL
dc.contributor.authorBonacic, Cristiánes_CL
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T15:37:58Z
dc.date.available2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T15:37:58Z
dc.date.issued2019es_CL
dc.identifier.citationCorrea, L. M., Zapata, B., Goddard, P., & Bonacic, C. (2019). The relationship between coping styles and responses to handling in captive guanacos (Lama guanicoe). Small Ruminant Research, 177, 103-105.es_CL
dc.identifier.issn0921-4488es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1879-0941es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.015es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/6601
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the present study was to evaluate the coping style response to handling of guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in captivity. This study contributes to a better understanding of the handling effect in captivity of the largest wild camelid of South America. Individual coping style response to handling was studied in 17 adult captive-bred guanacos. Handling was performed every 2 h for 24 h and serum cortisol concentration and behavioral responses were measured during the entire cycle of handling (12 times). Principal component analysis results showed three main factors: the first associated with reactive behavior (more immobility and escaping, less spitting) and the second and third associated with proactive behavior (more territorial control behaviors and less jumping). Nine animals were classified as reactive and eight as proactive, based on the highest component score attained. Mean cortisol concentration was 368.45 nmol/L in the reactive group and 155.96 nmol/L in the proactive group (p < 0.01). The lower levels of cortisol in the proactive group could indicate a higher ability to cope with adverse factors than the reactive group. An assessment of coping styles could improve the establishment of different management strategies oriented to increase animal welfare for diverse species of small ruminants in captivity.es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipFONDECYT (National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development)Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)CONICYT FONDECYT [11121544]es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Project 11121544 from FONDECYT (National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development).es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherELSEVIERes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceSmall Ruminant Res., AGO, 2019. 177: p. 103-105
dc.subjectAgriculture, Dairy & Animal Sciencees_CL
dc.titleThe relationship between coping styles and responses to handling in captive guanacos (Lama guanicoe)es_CL
dc.typeArtículoes_CL
umayor.facultadCIENCIAS
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoRoMEO green journal (Se puede archivar el pre-print y el post-print o versión de editor/PDF). Disponible en: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.phpes_CL
umayor.indexadoWOS:000487571800017es_CL
umayor.indexadoSIN PMIDes_CL
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.015es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q2es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)SCIMAGO/ INDICE H: 71 Hes_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace