Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributor.authorCelis-Morales, Carlos [Univ Mayor, Exercise Physiol Res Ctr CIFE, Santiago, Chile]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorLivingstone, Katherine M.; Petermann-Rocha, Fanny; Navas-Carretero, Santiago; San-Cristobal, Rodrigo; ODonovan, Clare B.; Moschonis, George; Manios, Yannis; Traczyk, Iwona; Drevon, Christian A.; Daniel, Hannelore; Marsaux, Cyril F. M.; Saris, Wim H. M.; Fallaize, Rosalind; Macready, Anna L.; Lovegrove, Julie A.; Gibney, Mike; Gibney, Eileen R.; Walsh, Marianne; Brennan, Lorraine; Martínez, J. Alfredo; Mathers, John C.es_CL
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T15:37:58Z
dc.date.available2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T15:37:58Z
dc.date.issued2019es_CL
dc.identifier.citationCelis-Morales, C., Livingstone, K. M., Petermann-Rocha, F., Navas-Carretero, S., San-Cristobal, R., O'Donovan, C. B., ... & Daniel, H. (2019). Frequent nutritional feedback, personalized advice, and behavioral changes: findings from the European Food4Me internet-based RCT. American journal of preventive medicine, 57(2), 209-219.es_CL
dc.identifier.issn0749-3797es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1873-2607es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.024es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/6605
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study tested the hypothesis that providing personalized nutritional advice and feedback more frequently would promote larger, more appropriate, and sustained changes in dietary behavior as well as greater reduction in adiposity. Study design: A 6-month RCT (Food4Me) was conducted in seven European countries between 2012 and 2013. Setting/participants: A total of 1,125 participants were randomized to Lower- (n=562) or Higher- (n=563) Frequency Feedback groups. Intervention: Participants in the Lower-Frequency group received personalized nutritional advice at baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of the intervention, whereas the Higher-Frequency group received personalized nutritional advice at baseline and at Months 1, 2, 3 and 6. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were change in dietary intake (at food and nutrient levels) and obesity-related traits (body weight, BMI, and waist circumference). Participants completed an online Food Frequency Questionnaire to estimate usual dietary intake at baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of the intervention. Overall diet quality was evaluated using the 2010 Healthy Eating Index. Obesity-related traits were self-measured and reported by participants via the Internet. Statistical analyses were performed during the first quarter of 2018. Results: At 3 months, participants in the Lower- and Higher-Frequency Feedback groups showed improvements in Healthy Eating Index score; this improvement was larger in the Higher-Frequency group than the Lower-Frequency group (Delta=1.84 points, 95% CI=0.79, 2.89,p=0.0001). Similarly, there were greater improvements for the Higher- versus Lower-Frequency group for body weight (Delta= -0.73 kg, 95% CI= -1.07, -0.38, p<0.0001), BMI (Delta= -0.24 kg/m(2), 95% CI= -0.36, -0.13, p<0.0001), and waist circumference (Delta= -1.20 cm, 95% CI= 2.36, -0.04, p=0.039). However, only body weight and BMI remained significant at 6 months. Conclusions: At 3 months, higher-frequency feedback produced larger improvements in overall diet quality as well as in body weight and waist circumference than lower-frequency feedback. However, only body weight and BMI remained significant at 6 months. (C) 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission under the Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and Biotechnology Theme of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development [265494]es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the European Commission under the Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and Biotechnology Theme of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (265494). The sponsor had no role in the study's design or conduct, data collection, management, analysis or interpretation, manuscript preparation, review, or approval. Author responsibilities were as follows: JCM was the Food4Me intervention study coordinator. ERG, LB, YM, IT, CAD, JAL, JAM, WHMS, HD, MG, and JCM contributed to the research design. CCM, SNC, RS-C, CBO, GM, CFMM, RF, ALM, MW, and JCM conducted the intervention. CCM performed the statistical analyses for the manuscript. CCM, KML, FPR, and JCM drafted the paper. All authors contributed to a critical review of the manuscript during the writing process and approved the final version to be published. None of the authors reported a conflict of interest related to the study.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceAm. J. Prev. Med., AGO, 2019. 57(2): p. 209-219
dc.subjectPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health; Medicine, General & Internales_CL
dc.titleFrequent Nutritional Feedback, Personalized Advice, and Behavioral Changes: Findings from the European Food4Me Internet-Based RCTes_CL
dc.typeArtículoes_CL
umayor.facultadCIENCIAS
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoRoMEO green journal (Se puede archivar el pre-print y el post-print o versión de editor/PDF). Disponible en: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.phpes_CL
umayor.indexadoWOS:000475736200012es_CL
umayor.indexadoPMID: 31248745es_CL
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.024es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q1es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)SCIMAGO/ INDICE H: 193 Hes_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace