Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributor.authorAstorga, Francisca [Univ Mayor, Fac Ciencias, Campus Huechuraba]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Valeskaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, Luis E.es_CL
dc.contributor.authorMedina-Vogel, Gonzaloes_CL
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T15:46:15Z
dc.date.available2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T15:46:15Z
dc.date.issued2019es_CL
dc.identifier.citationRodriguez, V., Poo-Muñoz, D. A., Escobar, L. E., Astorga, F., & Medina-Vogel, G. (2019). Carnivore-livestock conflicts in Chile: Evidence and methods for mitigation. Human–Wildlife Interactions, 13(1), 10.es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1934-4392es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1936-8046es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26076/djnz-sx73es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/6687
dc.description.abstractHuman population growth and habitat loss have exacerbated human-wildlife conflicts worldwide. We explored trends in human-wildlife conflicts (HWCs) in Chile using scientific and official reports to identify areas and species with higher risk of conflicts and tools available for their prevention and mitigation. The puma (Puma concolor) was considered the most frequent predator; however, fox (Lycalopex spp.) and free-ranging or feral dog (Canis lupus familiaris) attacks were also common. Our results suggest that the magnitude of puma conflicts may be overestimated. Domestic sheep (Ovis spp.) and poultry (Galliformes) were the most common species predated. Livestock losses were widespread across Chile but were highest in San Jose de Maipo, located in central Chile, and Cochrane, La UniOn, and Lago Verde in south Chile municipalities. Livestock guardian dogs and the livestock insurance, as a part of the Agriculture Insurance of Chile, were identified as the most promising tools to mitigate HWCs, short- and mid-term, respectively. However, longer-term strategies should focus on improving livestock management through extension (i.e., farmer education) programs for local communities. In Chile, HWCs negatively impact small farmers and wild carnivore populations. An interinstitutional and interdisciplinary strategy integrating input from government and nongovernmental organizations, farmers, and academia is needed to achieve effective carnivore conservation in the long-term.es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipDIPROREN-SAG project [612-177-LE 12]es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank R. Asenjo and C. Gonzalez, Compania de Seguros Generales S.A., P. Correa, and Flora and Fauna Chile Ltda. for the data and information provided. Special thanks to K. Keith for contributions in English editions and the crucial suggestions provided by G. Massei, HWI associate editor, and 2 anonymous reviewers that greatly improved our paper. Original SAG reports are available upon request to the corresponding author. This study was supported by DIPROREN-SAG project ID No 612-177-LE 12.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherJACK H BERRYMAN INSTes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceHum.-Wildl. Interact., SPR, 2019. 13(1): p. 50-62
dc.subjectBiodiversity Conservation; Ecologyes_CL
dc.titleCarnivore-livestock conflicts in Chile: evidence and methods for mitigationes_CL
dc.typeArtículoes_CL
umayor.facultadCIENCIAS
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoSIN INFORMACIÓNes_CL
umayor.indexadoWOS:000468201500008es_CL
umayor.indexadoSIN PMIDes_CL
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.26076/djnz-sx73es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q4es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)SIN INDICE Hes_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace