Show simple item record

dc.contributorSociedad Chilena de Infectologíaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán, Sebastián [Chile. Universidad Mayor]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorOlivares, Roberto [Chile. Clínica Dávila]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorFalconer, Mary A. [Universidad de Chile]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorAmaro, José [Universidad de Chile]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorFuentes, Marisol [Universidad de Chile]es_CL
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T14:11:50Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T14:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2013es_CL
dc.identifier.citationAlburquenque C, Beltrán S, Olivares R, Falconer MA, Amaro J, Fuentes M, Tapia CV. [Species distribution and susceptibility pattern of Candida spp.: the importance to survey also strains isolated from the community]. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2013 Jun;30(3):244-51. 10.4067/S0716-10182013000300002. Spanish.PubMed PMID: 23877775.es_CL
dc.identifier.issnISSN 0716-1018es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rci/v30n3/art02.pdfes_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182013000300002es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/2828
dc.description.abstractBackground: The most of the surveillance studies has been conducted in hospitalized patients with invasive infections. Recently, new clinical breakpoints (CBPs) have been proposed for antifungal susceptibility testing and epidemiological cutoffs (ECVs). Aim: To evaluate species distribution and susceptibility pattern of Candida spp. obtained from in and outpatients in a period of 6 months. Material and Methods: The isolates (n=223) came from vaginal discharge (51.6%), lower respiratory tract (24.7%), urine (20.2%), wounds (1.8%), blood (0.9%), peritoneal fluid (0.4%) and nails (0.4%). Results: The species distribution was C. albicans 84.8% (n: 189), C. glabrata 7.6% (n: 17), C. tropicalis 2.7% (n: 6), C. parapsilosis 2.2% (n: 5), C. kefyr 0.9% (n: 2) and others 1.8% (C. krusei, C. lusitanie, C. guilliermondii, C. intermedia) (n: 4). The susceptibility dose dependence (SDD) and resistance were 3.2% for fluconazole and 2.2% for voriconazole. The most of SDD and resistant strains were isolated from ambulatory patients. Also, a higher percentage of MICs over the new CBPs and ECVs were found in strains from ambulatory patients and especially in C. glabrata isolates to caspofungin. Conclusion: Taking into consideration that most of the invasive infections are caused by strains from the endogenous microbiota, and that there is a resistant population of Candida spp. in the community, should be important to include in surveillance studies strains isolated from ambulatory patientses_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipEste trabajo fue financiado por: Fondos internos de Clínica Dávila y Proyecto Fondecyt de Iniciación 11110160.es_CL
dc.format.extentARTÍCULO ORIGINALes_CL
dc.language.isoeses_CL
dc.publisherCIENCIASes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chilees_CL
dc.subjectINFECTOLOGÍAes_CL
dc.titleDistribución de especies y perfil de susceptibilidad de aislados de Candida spp: la importancia de vigilar también cepas de la comunidades_CL
dc.title.alternativeSpecies distribution and susceptibility pattern of Candida spp.: The importance to survey also strains isolated from the communityes_CL
dc.typeArtículo o Paperes_CL
umayor.indizadorCOTes_CL
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoLicencia color: VERDE (Revista Scielo)--Licencia creative commons BY // Disponible en: www.scielo.cles_CL
umayor.indexadoWOSes_CL
umayor.indexadoSCOPUSes_CL
umayor.indexadoSCIELOes_CL
dc.identifier.doi10.4067/S0716-10182013000300002es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q4es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)0.2es_CL


Show simple item record