Vista simple de metadatos

dc.contributor.authorKeyes, Katherine M. [Univ Mayor, Fac Humanidades, Soc & Hlth Res Ctr, Santiago, Chile]es_CL
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Avaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Jeffreyes_CL
dc.contributor.authorTracy, Melissaes_CL
dc.contributor.authorCerda, Magdalenaes_CL
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T15:37:40Z
dc.date.available2020-04-12T14:11:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-14T15:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2019es_CL
dc.identifier.citationKeyes, K. M., Hamilton, A., Swanson, J., Tracy, M., & Cerdá, M. (2019). Simulating the suicide prevention effects of firearms restrictions based on psychiatric hospitalization and treatment records: social benefits and unintended adverse consequences. American journal of public health, 109(S3), S236-S243.es_CL
dc.identifier.issn0090-0036es_CL
dc.identifier.issn1541-0048es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305041es_CL
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.umayor.cl/xmlui/handle/sibum/6414
dc.description.abstractObjectives. To estimate We number or lives saved From Firearms suicide with expansions of gun restrictions based on mental health compared with the number who would be unnecessarily restricted. Methods. Agent-based models simulated effects on suicide mortality resulting From 5-year ownership disqualifications in New York City For individuals with any psychiatric hospitalization and, more broadly, anyone receiving psychiatric treatment. Results. Restrictions based on New York State Office of Mental Health-identified psychiatric hospitalizations reduced suicide among those hospitalized by 851% (95% credible interval = 36,5%, 100.0%). Disqualifications For anyone receiving psychiatric treatment reduced Firearm suicide rates among those affected and in the population; however, 244 820 people were prohibited From Firearm ownership who would not have died From Firearm suicide even without the policy. Conclusions. In this simulation, denying Firearm access to individuals in psychiatric treatment reduces firearm suicide among those groups but largely will not affect population rates. Broad and unfeasible disqualification criteria would needlessly restrict millions at low risk, with potential consequences For civil rights, increased stigma, and discouraged help seeking.es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Drug AbuseUnited States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USANIH National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [R21 DA041154]es_CL
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport for this work was provided by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R21 DA041154, Keyes and Cerda).es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.publisherAMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INCes_CL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceAm. J. Public Health, JUN, 2019. 109: p. S236-S243
dc.subjectPublic, Environmental & Occupational Healthes_CL
dc.titleSimulating the Suicide Prevention Effects of Firearms Restrictions Based on Psychiatric Hospitalization and Treatment Records: Social Benefits and Unintended Adverse Consequenceses_CL
dc.typeArtículoes_CL
umayor.facultadCIENCIAS
umayor.politicas.sherpa/romeoGreen Publishedes_CL
umayor.indexadoWOS:000472846300021es_CL
umayor.indexadoPMID: 31242005es_CL
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305041es_CL]
umayor.indicadores.wos-(cuartil)Q1es_CL
umayor.indicadores.scopus-(scimago-sjr)SCIMAGO/ INDICE H: 236 Hes_CL


Vista simple de metadatos



Modificado por: Sistema de Bibliotecas Universidad Mayor - SIBUM
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2018  DuraSpace