Methodological characteristics and future directions for plyometric jump training research: A scoping review update

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review was a) to update a previous review on the main methodological characteristics and shortcomings in the plyometric jump training (PJT) literature, and b) to recommend, in light of the identified methodological gaps, future research perspectives. We searched four electronic databases. From 6128 potentially relevant articles, 420 were considered eligible for inclusion. As an update of a previous review, this represents an increase of similar to 200 articles, illustrating that this field of research is growing fast. However, the relative"quality"or shortcomings were similar when compared to the preceding scoping review. In the current article, the main identified shortcomings were an insufficient number of studies conducted with females, individual sports, and high-level athletes (similar to 22%, similar to 7%, and similar to 14% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient description of training prescription (similar to 54% of studies); and studies missing an active/passive control group and a randomized group allocation process (similar to 37% and similar to 24% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, PJT was often combined with other training methods and added to the participants' regular training routines (similar to 50% and similar to 35% of overall studies, respectively). The main outcomes of this scoping review urge researchers to conduct PJT studies of high methodological quality (eg, randomized controlled trials) to get trustworthy evidence-based knowledge. In addition, owing to the limited research conducted with females, individual sports, and high-level athletes, more studies are needed to substantiate the available findings. Finally, the identification of cohort-specific PJT dose-response relations which elicit optimal training effects still needs to be identified, particularly in the long term.

The aim of this scoping review was a) to update a previous review on the main methodological characteristics and shortcomings in the plyometric jump training (PJT) literature, and b) to recommend, in light of the identified methodological gaps, future research perspectives. We searched four electronic databases. From 6128 potentially relevant articles, 420 were considered eligible for inclusion. As an update of a previous review, this represents an increase of similar to 200 articles, illustrating that this field of research is growing fast. However, the relative"quality"or shortcomings were similar when compared to the preceding scoping review. In the current article, the main identified shortcomings were an insufficient number of studies conducted with females, individual sports, and high-level athletes (similar to 22%, similar to 7%, and similar to 14% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient description of training prescription (similar to 54% of studies); and studies missing an active/passive control group and a randomized group allocation process (similar to 37% and similar to 24% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, PJT was often combined with other training methods and added to the participants' regular training routines (similar to 50% and similar to 35% of overall studies, respectively). The main outcomes of this scoping review urge researchers to conduct PJT studies of high methodological quality (eg, randomized controlled trials) to get trustworthy evidence-based knowledge. In addition, owing to the limited research conducted with females, individual sports, and high-level athletes, more studies are needed to substantiate the available findings. Finally, the identification of cohort-specific PJT dose-response relations which elicit optimal training effects still needs to be identified, particularly in the long term.